CALL ME (24/7) 1.866.706.8857

Superintendent v. S.(D.) 2018

Superintendent v. S.(D.) 2018 Client was given two 90 day Immediate Roadside Prohibitions in a little over a year. She retained Mr. van der Walle to write the argument on both reviews. On both occasions Mr. van der Walle was successful and the driving prohibition was...

The Queen v. O. (T.) 2017 (Provincial Court of Alberta)

The Queen v. O. (T.) 2017 (Provincial Court of Alberta) ← The Queen v. W. (L.) 2017 You Just Received a 24-Hour Alcohol Prohibition - What Does That Mean? → The client was pulled over for having no mud flaps close to the town of Lake Louise on the Trans...

The Queen v. W. (L.) 2017

The Queen v. W. (L.) 2017 ← The Queen v. A. (M.) 2017 The Queen v. O. (T.) 2017 (Provincial Court of Alberta) → Client was charged with sexual assault after a woman reported to police that she had awoken to her mother’s ex boyfriend on top of her in...

The Queen v. A. (M.) 2017

The Queen v. A. (M.) 2017 A motor vehicle accident occurred in the early morning hours on a ski resort mountain road.  The client was driving a vehicle that rear ended another vehicle at a stop light.  Thankfully the woman and sole occupant of the vehicle that was...

The Queen v. M. (W.) 2017

The Queen v. M. (W.) 2017 Client was charged with making and possessing child pornography after the police executed a warrant at his house and found pictures on his computer and on digital storage devices that contained images of a day at the beach and on the boat...

The Queen v. H.(E.) 2017 (Alberta Queen’s Bench)

The Queen v. H.(E.) 2017 (Alberta Queen’s Bench) The client and his girlfriend were pulled over on the Trans Canada Highway near the town of Lake Louise for not having proper mud flaps and having illegal window tints. Soon after the pull over the police officer...