CALL ME (24/7) 1.866.706.8857

The Queen v. R.(S.) 2017

The Queen v. R.(S.) 2017 The client was initially charged with approximately 45 firearm offences, including possession of stolen firearms, after the police executed a search warrant at the client’s home.  At the preliminary inquiry Mr. van der Walle successfully...

The Queen v. M.(R.) 2017

The Queen v. M.(R.) 2017 ← The Queen v. M. (T.) 2017 Canadian Marijuana Legalization Soon To Be Announced → Client was observed driving his vehicle erratically just before crashing into a tree.  He was taken to the hospital.  Once he was deemed to be in fine...

The Queen v. M. (T.) 2017

The Queen v. M. (T.) 2017 ← Small Claims Court Matters Will Soon Be Resolved Online The Queen v. M.(R.) 2017 → Police in a rural community near Nakusp obtained a search warrant to search the client’s home for evidence of a grow op.  During the search...

The Queen v. N.(A.) 2017

The Queen v. N.(A.) 2017 As a police officer was  circling a bar in his vehicle watching for potential impaired drivers a black sedan came to his attention.  The officer began to follow the sedan and soon after the sedan took off at a very high rate of speed.  The...

The Queen v. Z.(K.) 2017

The Queen v. Z.(K.) 2017 Just as a civilian was a about to make a left turn at an intersection a car came flying by the side of the vehicle, clipped it, and went flying into the bushes. The client turned out to be the driver of the car that ended up in the bushes. He...

The Queen v. H.(B.) 2016

The Queen v. H.(B.) 2016 Client was observed by a police officer going through a McDonald’s “drive thru”. The officer watched as the car the client was driving bounced off the curb twice. The car then parked and the officer watched as the client...