The Queen v. R.(S.) 2017
The client was initially charged with approximately 45 firearm offences, including possession of stolen firearms, after the police executed a search warrant at the client’s home. At the preliminary inquiry Mr. van der Walle successfully argued that the client should not be committed to stand trial on the most serious of the charges. As a result, the client went ahead to trial on about a dozen remaining charges alleging various firearm offences. After a lengthy voir dire (a trial within a trial to determine the admissibility of evidence) the trial judge agreed with Mr. van der Walle that his client’s rights had been violated in many ways during the execution of the search warrant. As a result, the judge ruled that all of the evidence found during the search was inadmissible in the trial because of the constitutional violations committed by the police. The client was acquitted of all charges and did not have to testify. In the end, the Crown had charged Mr. van der Walle’s client with over 40 charges and were not able to get a conviction on even a single count. Copies of the trial judge’s rulings can be viewed here: https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2016/2016bcsc2474/2016bcsc2474.html?autocompleteStr=robertson%202016%20bcsc&autocompletePos=3 and here: https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2017/2017bcsc965/2017bcsc965.html?autocompleteStr=robertson%202017%20bcsc&autocompletePos=1
<div class="et_social_inline et_social_mobile_on"><div class="et_social_networks et_social_6col et_social_slide et_social_rectangle et_social_top et_social_no_animation et_social_nospace et_social_outer_dark"><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> <!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> <ul class="et_social_icons_container"><li class="et_social_facebook"><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> <a href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Flocalmarketingsecrets.website%2FJulian%2Fvernon%2F2017%2F10%2F24%2Fqueen-v-o-t-2017-provincial-court-alberta%2F&t=The%20Queen%20v.%20O.%20%28T.%29%202017%20%28Provincial%20Court%20of%20Alberta%29" class="et_social_share" rel="nofollow" data-social_name="facebook" data-post_id="10569" data-social_type="share" data-location="inline"><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> <i class="et_social_icon et_social_icon_facebook"></i><span class="et_social_overlay"></span><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> </a><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> </li><li class="et_social_twitter"><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> <a href="http://twitter.com/share?text=The%20Queen%20v.%20O.%20%28T.%29%202017%20%28Provincial%20Court%20of%20Alberta%29&url=http%3A%2F%2Flocalmarketingsecrets.website%2FJulian%2Fvernon%2F2017%2F10%2F24%2Fqueen-v-o-t-2017-provincial-court-alberta%2F" class="et_social_share" rel="nofollow" data-social_name="twitter" data-post_id="10569" data-social_type="share" data-location="inline"><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> <i class="et_social_icon et_social_icon_twitter"></i><span class="et_social_overlay"></span><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> </a><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> </li><li class="et_social_googleplus"><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> <a href="https://plus.google.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Flocalmarketingsecrets.website%2FJulian%2Fvernon%2F2017%2F10%2F24%2Fqueen-v-o-t-2017-provincial-court-alberta%2F&t=The%20Queen%20v.%20O.%20%28T.%29%202017%20%28Provincial%20Court%20of%20Alberta%29" class="et_social_share" rel="nofollow" data-social_name="googleplus" data-post_id="10569" data-social_type="share" data-location="inline"><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> <i class="et_social_icon et_social_icon_googleplus"></i><span class="et_social_overlay"></span><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> </a><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> </li><li class="et_social_gmail"><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> <a href="https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?view=cm&fs=1&su=The%20Queen%20v.%20O.%20%28T.%29%202017%20%28Provincial%20Court%20of%20Alberta%29&body=http%3A%2F%2Flocalmarketingsecrets.website%2FJulian%2Fvernon%2F2017%2F10%2F24%2Fqueen-v-o-t-2017-provincial-court-alberta%2F&ui=2&tf=1" class="et_social_share" rel="nofollow" data-social_name="gmail" data-post_id="10569" data-social_type="share" data-location="inline"><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> <i class="et_social_icon et_social_icon_gmail"></i><span class="et_social_overlay"></span><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> </a><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> </li><li class="et_social_linkedin"><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Flocalmarketingsecrets.website%2FJulian%2Fvernon%2F2017%2F10%2F24%2Fqueen-v-o-t-2017-provincial-court-alberta%2F&title=The%20Queen%20v.%20O.%20%28T.%29%202017%20%28Provincial%20Court%20of%20Alberta%29" class="et_social_share" rel="nofollow" data-social_name="linkedin" data-post_id="10569" data-social_type="share" data-location="inline"><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> <i class="et_social_icon et_social_icon_linkedin"></i><span class="et_social_overlay"></span><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> </a><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> </li><li class="et_social_all_button"><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> <a href="#" rel="nofollow" data-location="inline" data-page_id="10569" data-permalink="https://criminallawyerpentictonbc.com/2017/10/24/queen-v-o-t-2017-provincial-court-alberta/" data-title="The Queen v. O. (T.) 2017 (Provincial Court of Alberta)" class="et_social_open_all"><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> <i class="et_social_icon et_social_icon_all_button"></i><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> <span class="et_social_overlay"></span><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> </a><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> </li></ul><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] --> </div></div><!-- [et_pb_line_break_holder] -->
Related Stories
The King v. W.(A.) 2024
The client agreed to loan woman whom he had previously had sexual relations with a $100 loan to help her make rent for the month at her apartment in Penticton BC. The woman flirted with the client prior to his arrival at her apartment to give her the money by sending...
The King v. L.(K.) 2024
The client was pulled over by police after being observed weaving late at night on the highway near Kelowna BC. The officer smelled alcohol and had the client blow into a roadside device. The device registered a “fail” reading and the client was arrested and taken...
The King v. S.(M.) 2024
The client was driving down a residential street in Kelowna when she collided with a parked car. The police came to the scene and noted symptoms of impairment. They detained the client for impaired driving and made a breath demand on her. She ended up blowing well...
REQUEST A FREE CONSULTATION
Call 1.866.706.8857
Or fill out the form below to receive a free and confidential initial consultation.